Book banning and the American Way of education

Commentary

The banning of a Pulitzer Prize-winning book in a Tennessee school district is yet another example of the growing deterioration of American society

As I’m sure you’ve heard by now, a school district in the city of Athens, TN voted to ban a Pulitzer Prize-winning graphic novel about the Holocaust due to “inappropriate language” and an illustration of a nude woman, according to minutes from a board meeting. The book, of course, is Maus, by Art Spiegelman. Spiegelman won the Pulitzer Prize in 1992 for the work that tells the story of his Jewish parents living in 1940s Poland and depicts him interviewing his father about his experiences as a Holocaust survivor.

In the book, Jews are depicted as mice (“maus” is the German word for mouse) while Nazi’s are portrayed as cats, the mouse’s classic predator.

If you haven’t seen or read the book, it’s in two parts. Here’s an image from one page.

(Maus has never, unfortunately, been adapted into a movie. But at the end of this story I’ll insert YouTube  links to direct you to the entire opus, videoed with professional voice-overs of Spiegelman’s words.)

Minutes from the January 10th school board meeting (reporting of this meeting only surfaced this week as the world was preparing to mark International Holocaust Remembrance Day on January 27, the anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration camp in 1945) tell of objections over some of the language used in the book. At first, Director of Schools Lee Parkison suggested redacting it “to get rid of the eight curse words and a picture of a woman that was objected to.” The picture is of a nude Jewish woman, drawn as a mouse.

School Board Member Tony Allman said, “It shows people hanging, it shows them killing kids, why does the educational system promote (emphasis mine) this kind of stuff? It is not wise or healthy.”

Jonathan Pierce, the board member who initiated the vote to remove Maus from the eighth-grade curriculum, said during the meeting that the Holocaust should be taught in schools, but this was not the book to do it.

“Our children need to know about the Holocaust, they need to understand that there are several pieces of history … that shows depression or suppression of certain ethnicities (emphasis mine). It’s not acceptable today,” Pierce said, according to the meeting minutes. “…the wording in this book is in direct conflict of some of our policies.”

Apparently when more open minds prevailed in Athens*, Maus was deemed appropriate to include in the district’s eighth-grade English language arts curriculum.

Not anymore. Not during this current American, no, global, resurgence of anti-Semitism.

*(Do you, as I, see the irony of the banning of this book happening in a place called Athens, a city named after ancient Athens, the center for the arts, learning and philosophy; the home of Plato’s Academy and Aristotle’s Lyceum; the city-state widely referred to as the cradle of Western civilization and the birthplace of democracy.)

The board’s decision came amid a wave of conservative-sponsored legislation and other actions to pull books from schools, with other banned works including Toni Morrison’s The Bluest Eye and Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird.

If there is any good news coming out of this travesty of a decision it’s this: since the banning, sales of Maus have increased dramatically! Just days after news of the banning, two editions of Maus reached the top 20 on Amazon.com and are in limited supply. Neither book was in the top 1,000 at the beginning of the week.

And, in another Tennessee city, Knoxville, the comic bookstore, Nirvana Comics said they would give away copies of the book because they “believe it is a must-read for everyone.” They said all students need to do is ask for a copy by calling them or reaching out on social media.

Is the Athens school board decision simply an isolated instance of ignorance? Not if you believe the numbers from this Claims Conference Poll taken in 2020.

  • Among Americans under 40:
    • 48% couldn’t name a single Holocaust concentration camp;
    • 63% didn’t know that about 6 million Jews were killed in the Holocaust;
    • 11% think the Holocaust was caused by Jews.

Can you imagine what those numbers are in Tennesse?

I have a personal interest in this story for many reasons. One, in particular, is my connection to Tennessee where two great-nieces and a great-nephew have “benefited” from a Tennessee education system. Hopefully, after I encourage them to read this post we can discuss the issues and make it, for them and for me, a teaching moment. Oh, how they love their Uncle Ted!

But there’s also a related Tennessee story that bears a reminding. Athens, an hour drive from Knoxville is also a 30-minute drive from another East Tennessee city, Dayton. Why is this important? Because in 1925, Dayton was the site of the “Scopes Monkey Trial” in which high school teacher, John T. Scopes, was accused of violating Tennessee’s Butler Act, which had made it unlawful to teach human evolution in any state-funded school.

Butler, a Tennessee state representative and farmer, was also the head of the World Christian Fundamentals Association. Lobbying state legislatures to pass anti-evolution laws, he succeeded when the Butler Act was passed in Tennessee. Butler’s reasoning for establishing the law came down to, in his own words, “I didn’t know anything about evolution … I’d read in the papers that boys and girls were coming home from school and telling their fathers and mothers that the Bible was all nonsense.”

(If you’re interested in learning more, try to watch the film “Inherit the Wind” (it’s on Amazon Prime), a dramatization of the Scopes trial with the opposing lawyers, Henry Drummond (patterned after Clarence Darrow) and Matthew Harrison Brady (patterned after William Jennings Bryan), played by Spencer Tracey and Fredric March, respectively.)

Cover art

And there you have it. 97 years after the passing of the Butler Act and the Scopes trial (Scopes was found guilty but the verdict was later overturned on a technicality) virtually nothing has changed in Tennessee. And unfortunately, in most Red States.

To wit:

On Monday, newly elected Virginia governor Glenn Youngkin announced that he’s created a “tip line” for parents to report instances of school officials behaving inappropriately, by which he means teaching “divisive” subjects like critical race theory. Wait, what was the word used by the Gestapo in Nazi Germany and Stasi in Communist East Germany? You know, as the German newspaper Der Spiegel put it, the word used to describe: “Neighbors reporting on neighbors, schoolchildren informing on classmates, university students passing along information on other students, managers spying on employees and Communist bosses denouncing party members.” As Yale historian Timothy Snyder put it, “Denunciation.”

How low have we gotten when the governor of a state can use Nazi tactics to get his way?

I wanted to close with this – a very new, very chilling, short, fictional, documentary-style spot created for the Los Angeles Holocaust Museum. It was created and directed by Eric Hirshberg, a former advertising creative director and company CEO who, since leaving the business world, has devoted time to supporting important causes out of “Will Work for Change,” a creative network he founded to bring seasoned creative expertise and marketing to non-profits and mission-based organizations. 

As you watch the film bear in mind the opening two frames.

Could it? You be the judge.

Finally, as promised, Maus in video, by Art Spiegelman.

Maus Part 1

Chapter 1

Chapter 2

Chapter 3

Chapter 4

Chapter 5

Chapter 6

Maus Part 2

Chapter 1

Chapter 2

Chapter 3

Chapter 4

Chapter 5

The Greatest Football Game of All-Time will, unfortunately, be remembered for a not-so-great rule

Commentary

Without that rule, the Chiefs and Bills might still be playing

Last weekend’s NFL Divisional playoffs were astonishing. Four games. Four winners. Four woulda, shoulda, coulda winners but for one last play (except for, of course, the Packers, who absolutely should have lost to the 49ers). Winning margins of 3, 3, 3 and 6. An average winning margin of 3.75! It was a weekend of football that will never, ever, happen again.

But with all the drama, all the ups and downs, one game stood out. It was a game that will forever be referred to as “The Greatest Football Game of All-Time!” And that from a man who actually was in attendance at Candlestick Park on January 10, 1982 at the previous “Greatest Football Game of All-Time,” the NFC Championship game between the 49ers and the Cowboys, a game etched in every fan’s memory as the day of “The Catch.” (Yes, etched even in Cowboys fan’s memories…for reasons other than mine.)

Sorry, Cowboys fans. I couldn’t help myself!

That game this past Sunday? The Kansas City Chiefs vs. the Buffalo Bills.

Unfortunately, “The Greatest Football Game of All-Time” will not be remembered for its unsurpassed greatness; it will be forever tarnished by one of the worst rules ever devised by a professional sports league. In fact, as of this writing, three days after the game, if not for that rule, the Chiefs and the Bills might still be playing.

As regular time ran out, the teams were tied. Unlike the regular season where games can end in a tie, playoff games cannot – one team must move on. To address this, the NFL rules committee, in their infinite wisdom, came up with a solution. To avoid confusion or my own misinterpretation, here is the rule in Article 3.1 that determined the victor in the Chiefs/Bills game:

Both teams must have the opportunity to possess the ball once during the extra period, unless the team that receives the opening kickoff scores a touchdown on its initial possession, in which case it is the winner…

Kansas City won the coin toss at the beginning of the extra period and elected to receive the ball. Buffalo kicked off and NEVER HAD A CHANCE TO GET THE BALL BACK!

In essence, the winner was decided based on a FLIP OF THE COIN!

Is that hyperbole on my part? Consider this:

As Sports Illustrated reported, “According to the current overtime rules, a coin flip decides who gets the ball to start the extra period, and sudden death will not be enforced unless the team that gets the ball first scores a touchdown on the opening drive. Per NFL research, teams who won the coin toss have won 10 of the 11 playoff games since these rules have been enforced.” 

SI goes on, “Of those 10 games won by the team that won the coin toss, seven of those squads won via a walk-off touchdown on the opening drive.” 

No mathematician, I, but by my count the team that won the coin toss won 90.9% of the time and in 70% of those wins the opposing team never had a chance to get the ball!

Even the most recent beneficiary of this absurd rule, KC Chief coach Andy Reid, suggested it’s worth looking into changing the rules.

“I wouldn’t be opposed to it. That’s a hard thing. It was great for us last night, but is it great for the game, which is the most important thing we should all be looking out for? To make things equal, it probably needs to be able to hit both offenses, both defenses.”

As I was looking for some other event in which there could be a comparable finale, one of my daughters mentioned spelling bees, specifically the Scripps National Spelling Bee.

Here are the end of contest rules:

If only one speller spells correctly in a round, a new one-word spelling round begins and the speller is given an opportunity to spell [the championship] word on the list. If the speller succeeds in correctly spelling the championship word in this one-word round, the speller is declared the winner. But if that speller misspells the championship word in a one-word round, a new spelling round begins…”

For example, it’s the last round. Two spellers remain. Speller A correctly spells her word; Speller B incorrectly spells his word. Speller A is not declared the winner until she successfully spells one more “championship” word. If she misspells that word, Speller B is not eliminated and the two go on.

While not exactly the same, pretty close. Speller A is not the last person standing until she answers one more question. In the case of “The Greatest Football Game of All-Time,” Kansas City should not have been the “last team standing” until Buffalo had one more chance.

Professional football is the most popular game in America. It’s a money machine. But it’s clearly not run by geniuses. Perhaps some of that money should be used to hire some geniuses, maybe someone from the spelling bee organization – they must have a genius or two over there – to overhaul the rules. And not just this rule because it’s top of mind and possibly the most…egregious: E-G-R-E-G-I-O-U-S, egregious. But the entire rule book.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s Anti-Vax statements are both ignorant and reprehensible

Commentary

How a man can so completely destroy his family legacy is incomprehensible

There’s an old proverb, “The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.” The idea of this “chestnut” is that a person inevitably shares traits with or resembles his or her parents or family.

And then there’s Robert Francis Kennedy Jr. His “apple” fell so far from the Kennedy tree, it’s in an orchard where the trees only grow rotten apples!

RFK Jr., as he’s often referred to, is the third of eleven children of senator and attorney general Robert F. Kennedy. He is a nephew of president and senator John F. Kennedy, and senator Ted Kennedy.

Now, I’m not going to write an homage to the Kennedys; they were, starting with patriarch, Joseph P., and including Jack, Bobby and Teddy, flawed, to say the least. But mixed with those flaws was greatness. And, of all of them, Robert F. Kennedy, was preeminent. RFK was considered by two of his biographers as great, if not the greatest attorney general in American history. His advocacy of civil rights was legendary and his public speaking ability and compassion…who can forget his announcement to a crowd that Martin Luther King Jr. had been assassination…was unparalleled. He was on his way to winning the Democratic presidential nomination and, most likely, the presidency in 1968, if he hadn’t been assassinated in Los Angeles at the age of…42!

And then there’s “Junior,” whose Wikipedia article begins with, “…an American environmental lawyer, author, conspiracy theorist and anti-vaccine advocate.”

Based on his actions last week, it seems appropriate to focus on just two of his more nefarious occupations, anti-vaccine advocate and conspiracy theorist.

At a march in Washington, DC, in an event organizers called “Defeat the Mandates: An American Homecoming” Kennedy (I won’t honor him with his father’s sobriquet, RFK) compared U.S. public health policies regarding vaccine mandates to Nazi-era repression.

Among the poison emanating from this son of one of America’s greatest liberal icons:

  • “Even in Hitler’s Germany you could cross the Alps into Switzerland. You could hide in an attic like Anne Frank did,” apparently not realizing that Anne Frank hid in a building “annex” in Amsterdam and crossing the Alps from the Netherlands to Switzerland would have been quite a feat.
  • “I visited in 1962 East Germany with my father and met people who climbed the wall and escaped, so it was possible. Many died doing it, but it was possible,” he added, with no actual point in mind.

Putting on his conspiracy theorist hat, Kennedy went on, accusing Bill Gates of tracking Americans using a fleet of tens of thousands of satellites, in order to enforce what he called increasingly draconian rules on a helpless populace.

  • “Today, the mechanisms are being put in place that will make it so none of us can run and none of us can hide,” he said. “Within five years, we are going to see 450,000 low orbit satellites – Bill Gates has his 65,000 satellites alone – [which] will be able to look at every square inch of the planet 24 hours a day.”

Kennedy further claimed that 5G cellular networks, vaccine passports and digital currencies will be used “to harvest our data and control our behavior,” as well as “punish us from a distance and cut off our food supply.”

Full disclosure, I’ve not been following Kennedy’s career closely. But apparently, this isn’t his first encounter with lunacy. As reported in the Times of Israel,

  • “Kennedy has repeatedly utilized Holocaust-related metaphors to discuss his anti-vaccination stance. In his book about coronavirus vaccines released last year, Kennedy titled one chapter ‘Final Solution: Vaccines or Bust.’ According to the Guardian, when asked about the title, Kennedy said: ‘I don’t think the vaccines have anything to do with eradicating the Jews.’”
  • “In 2015, Kennedy used the word ‘holocaust’ to describe proposed legislation mandating vaccines for children and was criticized by the Anti-Defamation League. ‘I want to apologize to all whom I offended by my use of the word ‘holocaust’ to describe the autism epidemic,’ Kennedy said at the time.”

Clearly, the statute of limitation on “apologies” has run out.

Needless to say, the outrage was swift and harsh. According to the Times of Israel,

“The Twitter account for the Auschwitz Memorial and Museum in Poland responded to Kennedy’s comments in a tweet on Sunday. ‘Exploiting of the tragedy of people who suffered, were humiliated, tortured & murdered by the totalitarian regime of Nazi Germany – including children like Anne Frank – in a debate about vaccines & limitations during global pandemic is a sad symptom of moral & intellectual decay,’ the account stated.

In covering Kennedy’s outrageous behavior, many news outlets compared his statements to those of some of the more appalling right-wing GOP stalwarts, including Representatives Marjorie Taylor Greene (regarding vaccine mandates, “It appears Nazi practices have already begun on our youth.”) and Lauren Boebert (“Joe Biden has deployed his Needle Nazis”).

Greene and Boebert are certifiable nut-cases who do what they do to energize their base and ensure reelection. While Robert F. Kennedy is obviously a nut-case as well, he’s also the son of a true American hero. Watching him spew his hateful, ignorant nonsense is not only painful, but sad. To paraphrase Biblical quote, “the virtues of the father have clearly not been visited upon this child.”

Renowned presidential historian, Michael Beschloss, on the Supreme Court

Commentary

Your choice: Read, listen…and weep

I was plotting out a new, important story at the same time I was watching Joy Reid’s show, “The Reidout” on MSNBC. One of Joy’s guests was presidential historian, Michael Beschloss. For those of you who aren’t familiar with Beschloss, he’s a treasure…an historian with the uncanny ability to take on complex historical issues and make them easily understandable, even to those, who like Sam Cooke, “don’t know much about history. 

The segment that caught my eye on Reid’s show dealt with the tyranny of today’s Supreme Court. Along with two other commentators, Beschloss articulated what many of us already know, in a clear, but unfortunately, chilling, way.

I’ve included the entire 7-minute clip in this post. If you don’t have 7-minutes to spare, I’ve also transposed some of Beschloss’ key points. Either way, I’d expect you to be as chagrined at his comments as I was.

Joy: “[the Supreme Court] is sort of on the verge of at least trying to rapidly repeal all of the 20th century progress for everyone else.

Beschloss:  The right has been trying to do this for years. It’s been trying to rollback the progressive reforms of the Earl Warren court from the 1950s to the 1970s. They’ve been desperate for this;  they finally got it.  And you know the other thing Joy is, look at the justices we’re talking about. If the Democrats had won the presidency in 2016 there would be a strong liberal majority; we wouldn’t be having this segment. We could talk about something else.

The other thing is, this is a court that one-third of the nine justices [have been] appointed by one Donald Trump. Every single one of them has a shadow.

The first one – the first justice that was appointed and should have been appointed and confirmed in 2016 should have been Merrick Garland. That was a stolen seat. McConnell and Republicans refused to confirm him and as a result we have Neil Gorsuch.

Seat number two.  Anthony Kennedy was on the court. His son was a banker for Donald Trump at Deutsche Bank. By reports, the son was an accessory that Trump used to persuade at Anthony Kennedy to leave the court. That’s how we got Brett Kavanaugh.

Vacancy #3:  Being an election year of 2000, when Ruth Bader Ginsburg died, many people said, follow the precedent that was established by Abraham Lincoln…the similar situation [in] 1864. Wait for the new president to be elected and then go through this. Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell refused to do that; they rushed through Amy Comey Barrett. So as a result of all of these things we’ve got instead of a liberal majority, we’ve got a strong conservative majority and a majority of three justices who are pretty predictable how they’re going to vote on these issues.

Did someone say, “elections have consequences?”

One last thing. The piece I was working on before I watched the Reid/Beschloss interchange is alluded to at the end of the video clip. Another hint: “Since 2014, he (Beschloss) has been chair of the annual Robert F. Kennedy Book Awards.”

See you tomorrow.

Covid-19, Vaccinations, Mandates and the Incredulity of the Right

Commentary

Mandatory immunizations have been a thing in the U.S. for over 100 years. Why are we still debating the issue?

I don’t know about you, but when I was growing up I was taught that the law was the law and that those laws should not be broken.

But now that I’m very grown up, I’ve learned that the law is not really an etched in stone thing; it’s more like an opinion. And based on who you are, what your background is and, in the case of federal judges, including Supreme Court justices, who appointed you, you can kind of justify anything and call it “the law.”

The latest example of this is regarding “vaccine mandates” and a ruling from a federal judge in Texas (shocking!) who, according to the press reports, issued a preliminary injunction on Friday blocking the White House from requiring federal workers to be vaccinated against the coronavirus,

Interestingly, the ruling came months after the mandate’s November 22 deadline when, according to the White House, more than 95 percent of federal workers were already in compliance. As of this writing, the administration announced that 98 percent of federal workers are vaccinated or have sought medical or religious exemptions. So I guess this judge’s ruling is more a personal statement than something that has any real impact. Just saying.

The judge, U.S. District Court Judge Jeffrey Vincent Brown, nominated in 2019 to the federal bench by President Donald Trump (“I’m shockedshocked  that Trump would nominate such a man!”)* said that the Biden administration’s vaccine mandate for federal workers and contractors constituted an overreach of executive authority.

*(With apologies to Claude Rains/Captain Louis Renault and the entire cast and crew of “Casablanca”)

According to the Times, Judge Brown said his ruling was not about whether people should get vaccinated against coronavirus. He wrote that “…the court believes they should. It is instead about whether the president can, with the stroke of a pen and without the input of Congress, require millions of federal employees to undergo a medical procedure (emphasis mine) as a condition of their employment.” That, he said, was “a bridge too far.”

He went on to opine, “less invasive measures could protect public health, like masking, social distancing and remote work.” Gosh, I didn’t realize that the learned Judge Brown was also an epidemiologist in his spare time!

Perhaps it’s about time to unpack this whole “vaccine mandate thing.”

According to Pew Research,

“Many Republican governors reacted furiously when President Joe Biden said he would require employees at large businesses to either get vaccinated against COVID-19 or submit to weekly testing. But Republican- and Democratic-led states alike already require hundreds of thousands of their citizens – infants, toddlers and schoolchildren, mostly – to be vaccinated against a panoply of diseases. In fact, mandatory childhood immunizations have been a feature of American society since the 19th century.”

Pew goes on,

“Currently, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends routine vaccination against 16 diseases from birth through age 18. The CDC recommendations, in turn, inform individual states’ vaccine mandates: Typically, children who haven’t received the required shots for their age can’t attend school (public, private or parochial) or enroll in child care programs, though there are exemptions for religious, medical or other reasons.”

Here’s a small sampling of some of those state mandated vaccines:

Diphtheria, tetanus, and whooping cough (pertussis)
Hepatitis B
Polio
Haemophilus influenza type B vaccine*

*(On a personal note, my almost 2-year old son contracted, and died from, Haemophilus influenza a year before the Hib vaccine was developed and administered.)

I could go on, but by now you should have gotten the idea: Vaccine mandates are not a device invented by the radical left. They are real and, as Pew Research points out, have been “a feature since American society since the 19th century.”

Covid-19 is a highly contagious, often fatal, virus. And yes, I know one of the arguments proffered by the right is that it was developed too quickly and that it causes all kinds of horrible things to happen – like the death of Betty White for example. Besides that and other right-wing internet falsehoods, how many people do you know have died from a Covid-19 vaccine?

The fact is vaccinations are the best way to keep this insidious disease in check. And if the president of United States, in a national emergency, cannot mandate vaccinations to protect the populous with, as Judge Brown writes, “the stroke of a pen and without the input of Congress,” what can he do?

By the way I wonder if the good judge actually thought about how funny he was when he wrote, “without the input of Congress?”

I guess I’ll leave that subject to another column.

Where were you on 1/6/21?

Commentary

A year later and we’re no closer to the truth than we were on 1/7/21. While 2/3 of GOP voters believe “that there’s been too much focus on January 6”

Many of us remember where we were when a significant event occurred. I only remember two.

The first was on November 22, 1963. I was sitting on a bench overlooking the Queens College Student Union, on a break between classes, when I noticed a crowd gathering outside the Union building. As I walked down to find out what was going on, a fellow student told me that Kennedy had been shot. Another said that they were rushing him to the hospital but that he’d probably be OK. But Texas governor Connelly might not survive. Oops!

Continue reading “Where were you on 1/6/21?”

Around the Block is back! Did you know it was gone?

Commentary

As the SF 49ers play their last regular season game/first pre-post-season game, are they back too?

Around the Block has been pretty quiet the last few weeks. Perhaps it’s because of the holidays. More likely it’s due to self-inflicted trauma after realizing, and writing about the fact “we’re not in danger of losing our democracy, we already have!” in the last column. (https://around-the-block.com/2021/12/18/we-are-closer-to-civil-than-any-of-us-would-like-to-believe/). One reader even suggested that I seemed to be in a “dark place.” Dark or not, and despite two or three forthcoming ideas for future columns, I have been quiet. So how to begin again?

Why not football? And more specifically San Francisco 49ers football.

Talk about dark!

Continue reading “Around the Block is back! Did you know it was gone?”

‘We are closer to civil war than any of us would like to believe.”

Commentary

Insurrection, sedition, insurgency…studies show, we’re not in danger of losing our democracy, we already have!

The headline, and much of the story, for today’s Around the Block is taken directly from The Washington Post’s Dana Milbank, in his December 17 Op-Ed.

The headlined quote is from Barbara F. Walter, a political science professor at the University of California at San Diego. Professor Walter also “serves on a CIA advisory panel called the Political Instability Task Force that monitors countries around the world and predicts which of them are most at risk of deteriorating into violence. By law, the task force can’t assess what’s happening within the United States, but Walter…applied the predictive techniques herself to this country.”

Walter’s conclusion:

“We are closer to civil war than any of us would like to believe. No one wants to believe that their beloved democracy is in decline, or headed toward war but, if you were an analyst in a foreign country looking at events in America — the same way you’d look at events in Ukraine or the Ivory Coast or Venezuela — you would go down a checklist, assessing each of the conditions that make civil war likely. And what you would find is that the United States, a democracy founded more than two centuries ago, has entered very dangerous territory.”

As Milbank reports, “the United States no longer technically qualifies as a democracy. Citing the Center for Systemic Peace’s “Polity” data set — the one the CIA task force has found to be most helpful in predicting instability and violence — Walter writes that the United States is now an ‘anocracy,’ somewhere between a democracy and an autocratic state.”

But wait, it gets worse!

Milbank goes on, “U.S. democracy had received the Polity index’s top score of 10, or close to it, for much of its history. But in the five years of the Trump era, it tumbled precipitously into the anocracy zone; by the end of his presidency, the U.S. score had fallen to a 5, making the country a partial democracy for the first time since 1800.

“We are no longer the world’s oldest continuous democracy,” Walter writes. “That honor is now held by Switzerland, followed by New Zealand, and then Canada. We are no longer a peer to nations like Canada, Costa Rica, and Japan, which are all rated a +10 on the Polity index.”

She goes on,

“A partial democracy is three times as likely to experience civil war as a full democracy. A country standing on this threshold — as America is now, at +5 — can easily be pushed toward conflict through a combination of bad governance and increasingly undemocratic measures that further weaken its institutions.”

Increasingly undemocratic measures that further weaken its institutions? Haven’t I been hearing of things like that? Like voter suppression laws, gerrymandering and power grabbing by partisan politicians allowing them to overturn future election results… And a Supreme Court that sits back and lets it all happen?

If this is not enough, recent events are putting the run-up to the January 6th insurrection in the spotlight. And, it ain’t pretty.

Beyond former Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows’ incredibly dumb book revealing information that the Trump crowd didn’t want revealed, we now have this, from Peter Navarro, former U.S. trade adviser and Trump sycophant, courtesy of the Huff Post:

“In an appearance on former White House strategist Steve Bannon’s ‘War Room’ podcast Thursday, Navarro praised Bannon as a ‘hero’ for coming up with the ‘strategy to go up to Capitol Hill’ on Jan. 6.

“Navarro, using a football analogy about one team sacking another, gloated Thursday that there were ‘100 people working on the … team … who were going to make sure we remanded the [electoral] results back to the battleground states,’ which would have subverted Americans’ choice for president. Navarro also referred to former Vice President Mike Pence as the ‘quarterback’ of the offense, suggesting they had wanted Pence to go along with the plot.”

It’s kind of ironic. When Navarro was subpoenaed by the House select committee to testify, Trump urged Navarro to ignore the summons, keep mum and “protect executive privilege” in the investigation by the “Communist Democrats.”

Before I go, I just want this to sink in: the former President of United States called duly elected members of Congress who are investigating the greatest assault on the Capitol since the War of 1812, “Communist Democrats!”

This, by the way, is the same former president whose slogan was, and still is, “Make America Great Again,” but in the process, presided over a “Polity” score drop of five points, putting the U.S. in league with Mozambique, Niger,  Suriname, Papua New Guinea and Somalia, among others. Does anyone have a definition of “Great?”

I’ll close with my oft-used reference point to what’s happening in this country now, Sinclair Lewis’ 1935 dystopian novel, “It Can’t Happen Here.”

Yes it can…and indeed it did!

Putting “Christ back in Christmas” is like the old Burger King jingle: “Have it your way!”

Commentary

School says, “Christmas Tree yes, Menorah, no.” And judge agrees!

The San Francisco Chronicle reported today, “When a woman in Carmel sought to add an inflatable balloon decorated like a menorah to the tree-lighting ceremony at the school her third-grader attended, the school turned her down — and had a basis for its refusal, a federal judge says.”

The Chronicle went on, “’Although Christmas trees once carried religious connotations, today they typify the secular celebration of Christmas,’ U.S. District Court Judge Beth Labson Freeman said, quoting the [Supreme] Court’s 1989 ruling in a Pennsylvania case.”

Although Freeman said aspects of the case were “troubling” she did suggest that the student’s mother, Michele Lyons, could still try to prove the school violated her rights.

In her lawsuit, Lyon’s said that teachers at the school schedule parties around Christian holidays like Christmas and Easter and describe Christmas as an “American holiday” and Hanukkah as an “Israeli holiday.”

Okay, just to be clear, this school is in Carmel CALIFORNIA, not Carmel Texas.

The irony, of course, is that Hanukkah is a holiday with virtually no religious significance but important historical interest. I’ll leave for another time the question of whether the heroes of the story, the Maccabees, were heroic liberators and defenders of religious freedom or intolerant religious zealots, intent on stamping out any attempt to “modernize” Jewish tradition.

But I digress.

So which is it, do we put Christ back in Christmas when it suits us and exclude him when it doesn’t?

I thought I’d turn to Tammy Wynette for the answer.

One last thing. Do you think you can get a good hot pastrami on rye in this Carmel neighborhood? Do you think you can get them to hold the mayo?

Happy Holidays to all…and to all a Good Night.

“Assassins” then, would be assassins now

Commentary

I was in the process of outlining this story the other day when I got the news: Stephen Sondheim had passed away at the age of 91.

The Times headline said it all, Stephen Sondheim, Titan of the American Musical, Is Dead at 91: He was the theater’s most revered and influential composer-lyricist of the last half of the 20th century and the driving force behind some of Broadway’s most beloved and celebrated shows.

He was to me, as he was to many devotees of musical theater, an idol – an absolute one of a kind.

But why was I writing a story about a Sondheim show to begin with? Perhaps some background will help.

The subject matter of many of Sondheim’s shows are, in a word, curious. Some of the more unusual ones include:

  • A Roman slave who wants to gain freedom by helping his slave owner get the girl he wants. (A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum)
  • A mayoress saves a bankrupt town by whistling. (Anyone Can Whistle)
  • A musical set in Sweden based on an Ingmar Bergman film, with all the songs in 3/4 time to match the time signature of Mozart’s Eine Kleine Nachtmusik, from which the show’s title derives. (A Little Night Music)
  • An infamous demon barber of Fleet Street murders enemies who grace his chair, providing the remains to his accomplice/love interest for her to make “the best meat pies in London.” (Sweeney Todd)
  • A fictionalized account of the real-life French post-impressionist pointillist, Georges Seurat, who paints to create a life that he wishes he could live in. (Sunday in the Park with George)
  • A show that mixes fairytale classics including Cinderella, RapunzelJack and the Beanstalk  and Little Red Riding Hood into one incredible performance that includes a lyric, sung by the Wolf to Red Riding Hood in the song “Hello Little Girl,” that no one could ever forget: There’s no possible way/To describe what you feel/When you’re talking to your meal. (Into the Woods)

You’ve probably noticed that I’ve left the best, of at least most bizarre subject for a musical, out. And that’s because it’s really the subject of this essay, Stephen Sondheim’s Assassins. Assassins debuted off-Broadway in 1990 to mixed reviews and ran for only 73 performances. In the 2004 revival, which I saw and was mesmerized by, it won five Tony Awards. What a difference 14 years make; clearly, time changes everything.

From left: Brandon Uranowitz as Leon Czolgosz, Judy Kuhn as Sara Jane Moore and Steven Pasquale as John Wilkes Booth in “Assassins” at the Classic Stage Company.

But it was the current revival, again off-Broadway, that got me thinking about this show, one which doesn’t glorify the nine assassins/would be assassins of American presidents, but certainly provides some insights into their motivations.

The cast of characters:

American Presidents Assassination Attempts

                   Successful Unsuccessful
John Wilkes Booth – Abraham Lincoln Giuseppe Zangara ­– Franklin Delano Roosevelt
Charles Guiteau ­– James GarfieldSamuel Byck – Richard Nixon
Leon Czolgosz – William McKinleyLynette “Squeaky” Fromme – Gerald Ford
Lee Harvey Oswald – John F. KennedySara Jane Moore – Gerald Ford
 John Hinckley, Jr. – Ronald Reagan

But why the headline? Why “would be assassins” now? What does ‘now’ have to do with it?

Valerie Lynn Schrader, an associate professor of Communication Arts and Sciences at Penn State, examined the themes of Sondheim’s Assassins. In her analysis, she found that there are strong commonalities to these presidential assassins. Her conclusions led me to the idea that the motivations of these nine men and women seem strikingly similar to the would be assassins on the far right today.

  • Sacrificing for the Greater Good / Fighting Against Political Injustice
  • Desiring Attention
  • Idealism and Optimism
  • Pain, Desperation, and Disillusionment

Think about those motivations. Now think about the motivations of the January 6 insurrectionists seeking out Pence and Pelosi with their nooses. And the motivations, statements and social media posts of some of our far-right elected officials in Congress including Marjorie Taylor Greene, Paul Gossar, Matt Gaetz, Lauren Boebert and others. While these people haven’t literally “pulled the trigger,” they sure have talked about it. Is the actual trigger pull next? Chilling!

If you can…and I strongly urge that you do…seek out a performance of Sondheim’s Assassins. And when you watch and listen, think about this: written over 30 years ago, Assassins is something of a metaphor for our current troubled world.