Small consolation: At least we don’t have Tommy Tuberville and Marjorie Taylor Greene!
As incredible as it may sound, there were three stories and one Op-Ed in the South Florida Sun-Sentinel yesterday reporting on the undemocratic, lawless, deceitful and frankly, egregious activities of Florida’s governor, Ron DeSantis.
Let me start by listing the headlines:
The Undemocratic: Election integrity – DeSantis pushing voting changes that could help his reelection chances
The Lawless: Hotel gets warning for hosting maskless DeSantis crowd
The Deceitful: COVID-19 vaccines for votes: DeSantis’ shot-in-the-arm strategy
The Egregious: Democrats – DeSantis’ order to lower flags in honor of Limbaugh ‘an embarrassment’
Let me give you a minute to allow all this to sink in. In one edition of one newspaper, it was reported that the governor of the third largest state in the Union:
- Was trying to rig the next election to “help his reelection chances;”
- Doing so after touting that the 2020 election in Florida was a “voting success story;“
- Held a news conference in which a crowd of 100 to 150 people, 80% mask-less, including the governor himself, violated the Palm Beach County COVID-19 mask ordinance.
- Was chastised in an Op-Ed for:
- Dishing out COVID-19 vaccines to voters the way Florida politicians used to serve up barbecue;
- Showing up at vaccination facilities, all home to high-priority 65-and-up residents, at the front of the vaccination line electioneering these be reliable voters, paid for with your tax dollars, piped into your living room on TV in, what may be, an unbeatable re-election formula.
- Ordered flags to be flown at half staff in Florida to mark the death of Rush Limbaugh:
- Politicizing an honor usually reserved for the death of prominent government officials, police officers or firefighters who die in the line of duty, members of the armed forces or tragic events such the mass shootings;
- Doing so based on the request of a Republican Florida lawmaker because Limbaugh was a “relentless champion of America and of civic engagement.”
Minute’s up…yours and mine. No need to beat a dead horse. Just a reminder, in the next Florida horse race, there’s a horse named “Repugnant Ronnie” running; we need to beat “double R” as hard as we possibly can!
But before I move on to Florida’s junior senator, let me say this to my California readers: “And they’re trying to recall Gavin Newsom?”
So, what about Florida Senator Rick (Not So Great) Scott?
After Scott’s vote to acquit Donald John Trump (D.J.T.), otherwise now known as “The Former Guy” (T.F.G.) earlier this month, I sent an email to him saying in part, “… to say I was embarrassed by your vote would be a huge understatement. Disgusted might be more appropriate. Did you actually listen to the arguments today? I think not. Because if you were listening you could not have voted to convict…Thank you, Senator Scott, for making me ashamed to be a Floridian and ashamed to have you represent me.”
Since most communications to our elected officials are answered with a boiler-plate, non-specific reply, I was astonished today to receive this from Senator Scott:
“Dear Mr. Block, Thank you for contacting me regarding the second impeachment trial and subsequent acquittal of former President Donald J. Trump.”
My God, I thought, Scott’s reply actually had something to do with my email, so I read on.
Scott continued, “The attack on the Capitol we all witnessed on January 6 was horrific and the lawless thugs who are responsible for the disgusting violence we saw do not represent America. They should all be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. “
Wow, I actually said out loud, I can’t believe this. Have I misjudged our junior senator?
And then, the return to form.
“For weeks, instead of addressing the serious issues facing our nation, Democrats in Congress put our work for the American people on hold and pushed forward with an unconstitutional impeachment trial. It’s time to move our nation forward and get back to work…Blah, blah, blah, blah blah.”
In my response to Scott’s reply, I intend to remind him:
- As trite as it is, Congress can “walk and chew gum at the same time.” The trial lasted about a week. During that time the House continued working on as many of 19 different initiatives, bills and/or committee meetings according to the House’s legislative activity web site – https://www.house.gov/legislative-activity;
- Regarding the Senate, the trial took up a total of five days, one of which was a Saturday which wouldn’t have normally been a working day. Not that any of that matters. Accusing the Democrats of putting “our work on hold” is incredibly disingenuous when the record of the Senate is truly inspected:
- According to a study by Common Cause, only 1 percent of nearly 15,000 bills were enacted into law between January 2019, and September 2020;
- During that time frame, “the House of Representatives passed nearly 10 democracy reform bills, often with bipartisan support, but Majority Leader Mitch McConnell blocked debate and markups on all of those bills and refused to allow a vote.”
- Regarding the “unconstitutional impeachment trial,”
- The Senate voted 56-44 that putting Donald Trump on trial again is constitutional;
- The constitutional question would have been moot if McConnell (yes, him again) had not said that he would not take up the trial before Trump left office;
- Hundreds of constitutional scholars from ardent conservatives to liberals and progressives went on record stating the impeachment trial was, in fact, constitutional, writing, “Now that President Trump has left office, may the Senate take up an article of impeachment, and try, convict, and disqualify President Trump from holding future office? We, the undersigned constitutional law scholars, conclude it can.”
- With all due respect, although you obtained a law degree and passed the Texas Bar, before entering politics you were an executive in several health care enterprises. As a busy executive whose main purpose was to make as much money as possible for yourself and your cronies, er, shareholders, you probably didn’t have much time to study and reflect on the Constitution. Given that, I would venture a guess that your opinion on the constitutionality of the Trump impeachment trial is based less on the Constitution and more on your politics and your need to assuage your base.
And what about the third Florida Amigo, Senator “Liddle” Marco Rubio? I sent the same email to Rubio. As of this writing the only response I’ve received was that the correspondence was received. I’m not holding my breath.
5 thoughts on “DeSantis, Scott and ‘Liddle’ Marco – the Florida grifts that keep on giving.”
You really have âwinnersâ representing the state! Wonder how the governor will limit voting re early voting or mail-in for the next election! This country voted in larger percentages then ever – and the Republicans donât like that? What a âbumpy roadâ we are having and will have for a number of years. Bogles the mind!!!
Love to Sharon – Sue
YOU TELL THEM, TED. LOVE IT!!
I edited the DeSantis part of this post for a submission to the “Another Viewpoint” section of the Sun-Sentinel, the paper that printed the four articles that were the basis for my post.
They won’t run it but it felt good trying!
Thank you for telling them what I was thinking. I appreciate your trying to keep them honest, but I’m afraid they won’t listen. We have to work hard to see that they are not reelected.
Yes we do. Just remember, Repugnant Ronnie is running in the next election. And Liddle Marco is as well. We need not only to energize our base but expand it as well to make sure they both are defeated. Ideas? Anyone? I’m all ears!